The MALINDO DEFENCE Daily

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Cyber attack cripples Free Malaysia Today




Thursday, 08 April 2010 admin-s
E-mailPrintPDF
Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!MySpace!Yahoo! Twitter!LinkedIn! 
(FMT) KUALA LUMPUR: A massive cyber attack on the Free Malaysia Today web site over the past week has disrupted operations and left readers without access to news articles on the site. Legal action is now being contemplated against the Malaysian website and the hosting company from which the attacks came.
Free Malaysia Today management said: "We have identified the attackers and traced the attacks as coming through a popular Malaysian cyber forum based on servers located in Kuala Lumpur.
"We view these attacks seriously and are prepared to take all measures necessary to stop the attackers. We have engaged cyber-lawyers to look into the matter and a complaint to the Communications and Multimedia Commission is being prepared."
As a result of the attacks editors of Free Malaysia Today set up a temporary mirror athttp://freemalaysiatoday.wordpress.com for use whenever the main site became unavailable.
The attackers used hundreds of thousands of requests to Free Malaysia Today servers, launched from the forum every time a reader visited the forum site. "Every time a reader at the forum clicked on a page, 100 requests to Free Malaysia Today were made," said a site executive. The massive number of requests swamped the site's servers, leaving them unable to serve the news pages to legitimate viewers.
The spurious requests frequently paralysed the servers and also affected news operations. Editors were unable to update the site with current news. On Wednesday, the new MCA line-up could not be reported because the editors themselves could not reach the site.


* This article is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The blog owner does not endorse the view unless specified. To share the above article, please click the followings:
Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!MySpace!Yahoo! Twitter!LinkedIn! 
 

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Jangan biar Melayu dihina!



6 APRIL — Saya gembira membaca laporan yang dikeluarkan oleh Majlis Penasihat Ekonomi Negara yang menggariskan Model Ekonomi Baru (MEB) buat Malaysia.  Secara umumnya dokumen tersebut membuktikan betapa pemerintah kita mula sedar bahawa satu-satunya cara untuk membawa pembangunan pesat di negara kita ialah dengan memperteguh pengamalan sistem ekonomi liberal.
Bab 2 dokumen tersebut dengan tegas menyatakan bahawa negara kini telah terjatuh dalam perangkap pendapatan pertengahan (middle income trap). Perangkap ini bermaksud bahawa kita sukar untuk bersaing dengan negara-negara yang menawarkan kos operasi lebih rendah tetapi pada waktu yang sama juga tidak dapat menyaingi negara-negara maju yang mempunyai kebolehan teknologi lebih tinggi. Akibatnya kita “terperangkap” di tengah-tengah.
Kelemahan-kelemahan yang dihadapi oleh negara juga dibincangkan dengan terbuka dalam Bab 2 dokumen tersebut. Dalam bab-bab selepas itu pula, terutamanya dalam Bab 6, dinyatakan beberapa cadangan untuk memastikan negara boleh keluar daripada perangkap pendapatan pertengahan dan terus mara ke hadapan. Hampir semua cadangan yang dikemukakan menjadikan sistem ekonomi kapitalisme pasaran bebas sebagai teras.
Contohnya, MEB mengatakan bahawa sektor swasta amat penting untuk memacu ekonomi negara. Untuk membolehkan sektor swasta memainkan peranan dengan efektif, maka dokumen itu mencadangkan agar dihapuskan pelbagai subsidi, kawalan harga dan insentif-insentif yang mengganggu perjalanan sistem pasaran bebas. Penghapusan semua ini akan membawa negara kepada satu sistem ekonomi yang lebih bebas dan berdayasaing.
Saya tidak mengatakan dokumen MEB ini adalah satu cadangan yang sempurna. Masih ada ketempangan di beberapa tempat. Tetapi saya tidak berhajat untuk membicarakan dengan terlalu mendalam mengenai MEB dalam dalam artikel ini. Insha-Allah saya akan cuba menulis lebih lanjut mengenai MEB dalam jangka masa terdekat.
Dalam artikel ini, saya hanya mahu memperakui bahawa dokumen MEB telah menggagaskan satu permulaan yang baik untuk proses transformasi negara. Kelihatannya penggubal dasar negara menerima juga bahawa sistem kapitalisme pasaran bebas sahajalah yang boleh menjamin Malaysia akan menjadi sebuah negara maju. Syukur alhamdulillah.
Dalam kesempatan ini saya sebenarnya mahu mengulas mengenai tindakan pihak-pihak seperti Perkasa dan Datuk Ibrahim Ali yang seolah-olah sengaja mahu menggagalkan usaha Datuk Seri Najib Razak untuk mentransformasi negara.
Saya amat marah dengan mereka ini kerana mereka berselindung dengan nama Melayu untuk menghina dan memperkecil-kecilkan orang Melayu. Dengan bertopengkan nama Melayu, mereka bersuka ria menuduh orang Melayu tidak boleh bersaing dan tidak boleh maju  jika tidak dihulurkan tongkat seumur hidup. Lemah sungguh Melayu di mata mereka!
Tatkala Najib begitu yakin dengan kebolehan bangsa Melayu untuk bersaing di arena global, tiba-tiba ada pihak yang memperlekeh kebolehan orang Melayu untuk berjaya dengan usaha sendiri.
Tatkala Najib mengambil langkah berani untuk mengurangkan kebergantungan orang Melayu terhadap bantuan dan subsidi kerajaan, ada pula orang Melayu yang bersungguh-sungguh mahu menggagalkan usaha-usaha pemimpin parti Melayu sendiri.
Kenapa kita terpengaruh dengan tohmahan bahawa orang Melayu tidak akan berjaya jika tidak dilindungi oleh kerajaan? Kenapa tidak yakin dengan kemampuan bangsa kita sendiri? Orang Melayu tidak diciptakan bodoh atau cacat sehingga perlukan tongkat subsidi dan hak istimewa seumur hidup. Tidak sama sekali!
Hakikatnya walaupun pemuka-pemuka ini berbangsa Melayu, tindakan mereka datangnya daripada satu punca sahaja, iaitu perangai memandang rendah kebolehan bangsa Melayu.
Benarlah kata Tun Mahathir Mohamad bahawa Melayu mudah lupa. Mungkin mereka sudah terlupa bahawa pemerintahan Melayu yang amat berjaya pernah wujud di rantau ini ratusan tahun dahulu.
Hakikatnya bangsa Melayu adalah satu bangsa yang boleh berjaya seperti mana-mana bangsa lain di muka bumi. Meragui kebolehan bangsa Melayu adalah sama seperti menghina dan merendah-rendahkan kebolehan bangsa Melayu.
Banyak tindakan-tindakan Najib yang menunjukkan beliau kini yakin dengan kebolehan orang Melayu untuk bersaing dalam pasaran terbuka. Bukan sahaja bersaing, tetapi Melayu boleh berjaya dalam persaingan itu.
Contohnya, beliau telah meliberalisasikan sebilangan sub-sektor perkhidmatan kepada pasaran bebas, menjemput pemodal asing melabur di negara kita, menurunkan kadar cukai, cuba mereformasi sistem percukaian dan berusaha mengurangkan kebergantungan orang Melayu terhadap subsidi.
Semua ini adalah langkah-langkah baik menuju ke arah sistem ekonomi liberal berteraskan pasaran bebas. Sistem pasaran bebas amat diperlukan untuk menjadikan Malaysia sebuah negara maju yang rakyatnya berpendapatan tinggi.
Lawan kepada sistem ekonomi liberal pasaran bebas ialah sistem ekonomi terkawal. Contoh paling senang sistem ekonomi terkawal ialah sistem komunis atau sosialis. Kita semua tahu bahana kemiskinan yang dibawa oleh sistem komunis dan sosialis. Melayu tidak memerlukan ekonomi terkawal seperti komunisme atau sosialisme.
Sebagai pemimpin yang telah memulakan langkah pendekar untuk mentransformasi nasib rakyat termasuklah bangsa Melayu di tanah air ini, Najib dan para pemimpin negara perlu terus iltizam membangunkan ekonomi negara supaya menjadi lebih terbuka.
Model Ekonomi Baru harus teguh menjadikan sistem pasaran bebas sebagai terasnya, dan berusaha menghilangkan mentaliti subsidi daripada pola pemikiran orang Melayu.
Orang Melayu perlu berhenti menghina dan memperlekeh kebolehan bangsa sendiri. Orang Melayu perlu menolak mana-mana individu atau pertubuhan yang mengatakan bahawa Melayu terus perlukan perlindungan kerajaan. Mereka itu adalah Melayu yang tidak yakin dengan kebolehan bangsa sendiri. Jangan kita percaya jika individu atau pertubuhan itu menyatakan mereka mahu “melindungi” bangsa Melayu. Sikap tidak yakin mereka kepada kebolehan Melayu sebenarnya adalah satu penghinaan kepada orang Melayu.
Melayu boleh bersaing. Melayu boleh berjaya. Jangan biarkan pemuka-pemuka itu terus menghina bangsa Melayu!
* The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the columnist.



* This article is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The blog owner does not endorse the view unless specified. To share the above article, please click the followings:
Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!MySpace!Yahoo! Twitter!LinkedIn! 
 

Friday, April 2, 2010




* This article is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The blog owner does not endorse the view unless specified. To share the above article, please click the followings:
Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!MySpace!Yahoo! Twitter!LinkedIn! 
 

Thursday, April 1, 2010


What will happen to Singapore if the opposition wins the next general election?






In the highly unlikely scenario that a “freak” result occurs in the next general election due to be called soon which sees the PAP being booted out of office, what will happen to Singapore?
Actually, life will continue as before despite the doomsday predictions by PAP activists and apologists that Singapore will collapse like a pack of cards without the PAP governing the nation.
Contrary to the fear-mongering propagated by PAP leaders, our flats will not become worthless overnight, foreign investors will continue to stay put and Singapore will remain as stable as before.
The only people who will suffer an economic loss are the PAP ministers who will be stripped of their multi-million dollar salaries.
During the 2008 Malaysian general elections, the opposition won the two richest states of Penang and Selangor for the first time and form the state governments.
The Democratic Action Party (DAP) heads the Penang state government while Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) governs Selangor. Both have no prior experience in governance.
As the Malaysian opposition had difficulties recruiting credible and qualified candidates into its ranks for the election whose results were completely unexpected, they had problems filling the state exco positions of the state governments.
Nearly half of the state executive councillors in Penang and Selangor have no tertiary education with some barely completing secondary school.
Furthermore, the states were deprived of funding from the federal government in Kuala Lumpur which is still controlled by the Barisan Nasional coaltion.
Though there were initially some fears about their competence, the opposition-led states not only did not implode from within, they continue to attract foreign investments and life remain the same as before for the people living there.
The Penang state government has introduced an open tenure system for bidding government contracts and Selangor requires its exco members to reveal their salaries and assets to the public.
These are positive steps forward in good public governance which will never be taken under the previous administrations.
Your correspondent visited the two states in February and can attest to the fact that they are still as stable and prosperous as before. In fact, many of Penangites have a favorable impression of the DAP-led government and it is unlikely that the BN can recapture the state in the next general election.
If the Malaysian opposition can rule two states much larger in size than Singapore, why can’t our opposition do so?
According to a recent Straits Times report, the opposition has seen an increasing number of professionals and graduates joining its ranks. Some 70 percent of the candidates standing under the opposition banner in the last election have a tertiary education and the pecentage will surely increase in the next.
With due respect to the Malaysian opposition, our opposition should be of a higher quality and caliber than them.
We have highly qualified leaders within the opposition camp such as Reform Party’s Secretary-General Kenneth Jeyaretnam, a double-degree graduate in economics from Cambridge University who can fill a ministerial position in any cabinets in the world.
Also in the Reform Party are a former SAF scholar Tony Tan and a former senior civil servant Hazel Poa, both in their mid 30s.
From the Workers’ Party, we have Mr Low Thia Kiang, an opposition veteran with nearly 20 years of experience in Parliament and Ms Sylvia Lim, a lawyer by training.
The other opposition parties also boast of candidates from various fields such as medicine, engineering, economics and education.
While the opposition may not have any experience in governing Singapore, they are unlikely to make a mess out of it as the Malaysians have shown.
More importantly, we have a first world civil service to run the nation. The ministers are only in charge of formulating national policies whose implementation on the ground lies with the civil servants.
In other democracies, it is common to see governments come and go and prime ministers replaced every now and then, but the nation stays strong and continues to grow.
For example, Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) was voted out of office after 53 years in power, longer than the PAP. It was replaced by the Democratic Party of Japan which has no experience in governance. Do we see Japan in chaos today?
It is high time that Singaporeans do some “spring-cleaning” and sweep the undeserving deadwood out of office so that qualified men can bring about much needed changes in Singapore.
The PAP has clearly run out of ideas to lead Singapore judging from its gross mismanagement of the Singapore economy.
Our GDP growth over the last few years is a mirage – it is built largely on the mass importation of cheap foreign workers which reduce labor costs, thereby inflating the GDP figures at the same time.
A certain percentage of the PAP ministers’ salaries is pegged to GDP growth – the higher the figures, the more money they bring home.
During the same period of time, the median salaries of Singaporeans have stagnated, cost of living has sky-rocketed, income gap between the rich and the poor have widened considerably and standard of living has declined.
We cannot continue relying on foreign workers forever and must move up the value chain fast to produce world class companies and products like the other Asian Tigers, but innovation is incompatible with a totalitarian form of government which brooks no dissent.
The PAP will not make any changes which will threaten its political hegemony. What is good for its survival may not be in the best interests of the nation.
Things cannot get worse than now. We seriously need an urgent overhaul of the entire system and put things back into order.
So Singaporeans should not be fearful of voting for the opposition in the next general election for the opposition’s success will open the floodgates to encourage more Singaporeans to join politics to serve the nation.
An open, competitive and fair political system will only improve public governance and ensure that only sound policies which take the interests of Singaporeans into consideration are implemented.

EDITORS’ NOTE:
Please join our Facebook discussion on this article here and invite your friends to do so as well to raise awareness among fellow Singaporeans.


* This article is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The blog owner does not endorse the view unless specified. To share the above article, please click the followings:
Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!MySpace!Yahoo! Twitter!LinkedIn! 
 
1Malaysia (9) Abdullah Badawi (1) affair (1) Allah (8) Alliance (1) altantuya (1) alternative (1) Anwar Ibrahim (2) article 153 (5) australia (2) BN (13) boycott (1) british (1) bumi (2) chinese (2) clause 2.2 (3) colonial (1) constitution (10) danby (1) DAP (19) defense (1) discrimination (1) DNA (1) DPMM (1) DSAI (43) DSNR (5) economy (2) education (1) engine (1) F-5E/F (1) Father as cadet At King Edward VIII circa 1964 (1) FDI (1) financial (1) flotilla (3) gaza (1) Gerakan (1) Gobalakrisnana (1) harakah (1) Hulu Selangor (1) Ibrahim Ali (1) IDF (1) IMF (1) interfaith (1) Iraq (1) Islam (4) JJ (1) Johor (1) judge (2) KadirJasin (1) karpal (1) Kelantan (1) ketuanan (1) kiasu (1) KJ (5) Ku Li (1) Law (1) LGE (12) liberal (1) LKS (9) MACC (1) Mahathir (3) malay (22) Malaya (2) Malaysia (2) MCA (4) MCKK (1) meb (1) melayu (4) Mindef (1) MP (2) MPM (3) najib (5) Nasir Safar (1) nazri chief (1) Nazrin (1) NEM (3) NEP (21) nga (1) ngo (3) nik aziz (1) nizar (5) NKRA (2) nurul Izzah (1) nut graph (1) PAP (1) parliament (3) PAS (13) Pemuda (4) Penang (9) Perak (8) perkasa (11) Pete (1) petroleum (1) PKR (22) ponder (1) PR (29) Pulau Pinang (1) races (1) racist (3) reid (2) religion (1) reuters (1) rights (1) RLC (1) rmc (2) RMN (1) RPK (9) russia (1) sabah (1) saddam (1) sarawak (1) SBA (2) Singapore (2) sodomy (15) submarine (1) sukhoi (2) TAR (2) TDM (10) tony pua (1) TRH (1) TSMY (1) UMNO (29) USA (2) Utusan (1) vietnam (1) WMD (1) women (1) Zaid (1) Zambry (2) zulkifli nordin (7)

Search This Blog

Powered By Blogger